Does the language of revelation as delivered by Revelators in TUB affect how we perceive them? There is an area of study in linguistics that looks into language and how it shapes our perception of reality, and in this case the reality of the revelations. And this is why I am a firm believer that relying solely on a literal interpretation of TUB handicaps the mind to the multitudinous layers of revelation.

Click on below link to study.


link

Does the language of revelation as delivered by Revelators in TUB affect how we perceive them?

There is an area of study in linguistics that looks into language and how it shapes our perception of reality, and in this case the reality of the revelations. And this is why I am a firm believer that relying solely on a literal interpretation of TUB handicaps the mind to the multitudinous layers of revelation.

Click on below link to study.


link

Well, yes. If we understand the language they deliver it with, then we can perceive what is being said. Isn't that obvious? If it is delivered in a language I don't speak or know, then I won't be able to understand. Again, pretty obvious.





I don't think there is any question that language shapes our perceptions of reality - if we don't have a word for something, our minds cannot grasp or retain that concept. Memory works the same way; until we have a critical mass of vocabulary, we cannot retain memories; that is why we rarely remember things from when we were pre-verbal.

The revelators do say that they are handicapped by their inability to express some of the revelations in our language; they find it difficult to convey some concepts that they know in whatever language they speak on Jerusem or wherever, so yes; I'd say the answer to the question you post is definitely yes. But the revelators have the ability to overcome, for the most part, any serious inability to expain to us what they want us to know in our own language, so no worries.

Again, what it says in the article is, for the most part, well understood intuitively by most people. I don't see anything earth-shattering there. Furthermore, I have no doubt that the revelators know more about how language impacts our perceptions than any current scientist ever will. So I have no reason to think that they didn't already take all that into account as they were indicting the written papers in a way that would best provide the average person with the greatest opportunity to understand and perceive the revelations.

Before you proceed farther along, I posit that "Babbling" to musically speak as in the imitation of another's dialect, or musically skatting, is a healthy exercise in that the human individual is not as constrained by the usual consonants of their native language. In fact, new syllables and tones are often expressed.

I think that the original human languages may have been an imiatation of what was heard from the sounds of the universe: both as in the sounds of meteors and rustling trees, but also that the original Adam and Eve language may have been universe sounds spoken by Universe Mother Spirit. How can we know this for certain!

The ability to consider several possibilities at once in the mind, is how the original Adamites possessed such eloquence. There is also the consideration that vibrations were telenetically spoken betweenst these people. How does language and especially our mental comprehension of the spoken words, affect our reactions! How are the ideas and words connected to the universe subjects experiencially!

And this is why I am a firm believer that relying solely on a literal interpretation of TUB handicaps the mind to the multitudinous layers of revelation.