Urantia Book Forum

Urantia Book Discussion Board : Study Group
It is currently Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:25 am +0000

All times are UTC - 7 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted:  
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:14 am +0000
Posts: 195
I would like to ask our scientific members to explain this in the light of the Papershttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7717425/amp/Hungarian-scientists-closing-FIFTH-force-nature.html

I know the Daily Mail is probably not the cleanest source of information, but I came across the article and was curious. Mainstream physicists and cosmologists are arriving at some interesting conclusions as they dig deeper into the fabric of time-based reality.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted:  
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:07 am +0000
Posts: 949
Hi Pethuel,

The physicists seem to be probing the pre-electronic or subatomic realm of matter. They have evidence that a new particle that fits there can be brought into existence or separated from the atom.

42:4.12 (474.2) The existence of pre-electronic forms of matter is indicated by the two atomic weights of lead. The lead of original formation weighs slightly more than that produced through uranium disintegration by way of radium emanations; and this difference in atomic weight represents the actual loss of energy in the atomic breakup.

The so-called Standard Model contains a catalog of subatomic particles that are known to exist based on experimental results and whose existence and characteristics is roughly compatible with a particular mathematical generating algorithm. This new particle, if it actually exists, doesn't fit a known configuration of the mathematical generating algorithm. That would mean that the algorithm behind the Standard Model is either incomplete or erroneous.

This new particle would seem to be not too different in mass from a pi meson, which was originally called a "mesotron".

42:8.4 (479.2) As atoms are constituted, neither electric nor gravitational forces could hold the nucleus together. The integrity of the nucleus is maintained by the reciprocal cohering function of the mesotron, which is able to hold charged and uncharged particles together because of superior force-mass power and by the further function of causing protons and neutrons constantly to change places. The mesotron causes the electric charge of the nuclear particles to be incessantly tossed back and forth between protons and neutrons. At one infinitesimal part of a second a given nuclear particle is a charged proton and the next an uncharged neutron. And these alternations of energy status are so unbelievably rapid that the electric charge is deprived of all opportunity to function as a disruptive influence. Thus does the mesotron function as an “energy-carrier” particle which mightily contributes to the nuclear stability of the atom.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted:  
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:14 am +0000
Posts: 195
Riktare wrote:
Hi Pethuel,

The physicists seem to be probing the pre-electronic or subatomic realm of matter. They have evidence that a new particle that fits there can be brought into existence or separated from the atom.

42:4.12 (474.2) The existence of pre-electronic forms of matter is indicated by the two atomic weights of lead. The lead of original formation weighs slightly more than that produced through uranium disintegration by way of radium emanations; and this difference in atomic weight represents the actual loss of energy in the atomic breakup.

The so-called Standard Model contains a catalog of subatomic particles that are known to exist based on experimental results and whose existence and characteristics is roughly compatible with a particular mathematical generating algorithm. This new particle, if it actually exists, doesn't fit a known configuration of the mathematical generating algorithm. That would mean that the algorithm behind the Standard Model is either incomplete or erroneous.

This new particle would seem to be not too different in mass from a pi meson, which was originally called a "mesotron".

42:8.4 (479.2) As atoms are constituted, neither electric nor gravitational forces could hold the nucleus together. The integrity of the nucleus is maintained by the reciprocal cohering function of the mesotron, which is able to hold charged and uncharged particles together because of superior force-mass power and by the further function of causing protons and neutrons constantly to change places. The mesotron causes the electric charge of the nuclear particles to be incessantly tossed back and forth between protons and neutrons. At one infinitesimal part of a second a given nuclear particle is a charged proton and the next an uncharged neutron. And these alternations of energy status are so unbelievably rapid that the electric charge is deprived of all opportunity to function as a disruptive influence. Thus does the mesotron function as an “energy-carrier” particle which mightily contributes to the nuclear stability of the atom.


Excellent Riktare, thank you so much for the help!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Registered users: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group