coop wrote:
Why do you often seem so Negative ?
By what means do you think that my presentations are "negative"?
My memory allows me to cross reference UB data, which is presented, with the addition of text searching and attempting to ascertain the meaning or possible definitions of words used in the UB but not found outright in the English language, where many standard words can have multiple meanings which should be determined based on there usage in context. Therefore, when one person reads a section or paragraph in the UB, I may also read it as they may have perceived it but often after reading the entire paragraph or section much of the information seems less related to the base subject. Many of the words used seem out of place and otherwise unnecessary in making the general point, and when a word has several possible means it is difficult to ascertain what the authors may have intended based on the level of their understanding and or the reader's.
By braking down the sentence structure some of the normal definitions of these words can take on numerous meanings, some of which when presented with different meaning can seem negative but, are just a different way of reading comprehension.
When there appears to be a grammatical contradiction, I take that to indicate that there might be more to the narration then would be understood as simply read, thereby I actually study the text in relation to the other text presented in the UB.
So your point that I seem negative, is only in relation to positive, where it would be easier to say that I seem more opposite to the average understanding or comprehension. Also, sometimes it is difficult to force oneself to regress to a normal or average way of thinking just to socially fit in with the norm.
coop wrote:
Dont you believe its a friendly universe?
Since I only have this planets past history and its current events to judge whether something is "friendly" or not, it would be premature for me to assume that the entire universe is a friendly place. Although from what we can ascertain from the workings of the cosmology of the universe it would seem that it can be a hostile environment for humans without having experienced the environment of other places or planets in this universe. Also, if we take for granted that this planet and its material solar system was created by a monarchist civilization and that they refuse to take material possession or control of their creation, would lead me to believe that we must assume that we are less in control then is believed, and that if true, a margin call may be forthcoming in the future.
So the better question would be, is this a friendly planet?
coop wrote:
Or that the ascenscion plan is Real ?
As we might ascertain from the UB, we can only assume that an ascension plan is in place, because as indicated in order to find out we would need to die, and be able to determine from the aftermath or after-product of this death, to be able to validate such proof. However, from experience it would seem that time is unrelated to space and that reality is more than a personal understanding which may not be shared through experience alone. Then, if there is a plan for ascension, what would be the destination or objective? That is assuming that in order to ascend, one must be below a certain point or at the bottom, which would place a limit to either up or down, some finite points?