|
Hm electron's diameter I am not interested in this as much as the distance whereby it crests and falls in its oscillation, when the electron-in-question has settled into a valence of the atom, the trajectory, the maximum velocity, and the rates of fluctuation in the vector of its trajectory, velocity, acceleration, and rate of acceleration et cetera.
Fractional quantum hall effect? This is news to me. It sounds like some nugget of fact which you have been chewing over with the scientific community.
I am trying to hold in my mind, the formulative folding effect of ultimata ultimatons, into subatomic particles. I am having a difficulty in "shaking" the effect of the unitary model, of summative components comprising measurable integers, which represent the uniform subatomic particles. Tell me more about this fluidity effect of electrons, what are the "fixed" components of an electron, and what are the "exchangable" components in the electron, based on its microphases which you are describing. What is the homeostasis-equilibrium effect on the electron, having more "exchangable" components (ultimata, quanta, sub-subatomic particles).
I find the model of electrons in 2D space to be nonexperiencial, purely theoretical. How does this model hold true in 3D space? I am just confused because I do not think of "space", a 3D concept, as possibly existing in 2D "area".
Nigel is describing the "compound interest" of materiality. He describes at least two, perhaps several, dimensions of force-activity, in the folding and angular arrangements of the segregata into ultimata into sub-atomic particles and then electrons. He is noticing the tendency for patterns and directionalisation factors within the subatomic particles, or the fluid clusters of similar subatomic particles. But in my opinion there should be separate sets of language to describe the folding-angularisation effect of ultimata, versus the formulation of distinct ultimata into distinct subatomic particles.
I can imagine that there are distinct ultimata comprising the structure of every electron. I can imagine that electrons are not necessarily integers, but exist in relative states, and the way they can gain photonic discharge speaks to a homeostasis of their energetic state, and thereby their trajectories become predictible in the model of the universe based on their space-force reaction to other objects comprised similarly (in terms of having the same type of substance, as matter is space-time conditioned in our locality.)
_________________
the how cannot be separated from the why, and the why cannot be separated from the who
|
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Members
