no sophist wrote:
Classic physics calls these members electrons, are electrons different sizes?
According today's Physics, electrons are all identical. Any one can be substituted with any other. But remember that inside an atom electrons tend to lose their individuality and function as a cloud of energy rather than a point particle. This is well known in Quantum Mechanics.
Quote:
And what about the idea of revolutionary rates? Are these axial or orbital or both?
IMO it involves not only axial and orbital "spin" rates but the "spin" of components internal to an electron or neutron or proton.
Nigel has talked a bit about chirality which consists of not only a revolution of a subparticle but a change of direction of the subparticle's trajectory as it is spinning due to external or internal forces. When the revelators say "revolution", they apparently include in that meaning what we now call "spin". A spinning particle doesn't necessarily have a fixed axis and is not necessarily rigid. A cloud of electrons within an atom certainly moves around the core of the atom but it doesn't quite have a fixed axis and is not a rigid structure.
Remember too, that the revelators talked about both a Physical Controller and Morontia Controller working in conjunction to modify many different revolution rates at the same time evidently. That would be necessary to avoid the dissolution of the particles being operated on.
Quote:
What about different sizes?
Sizes are generally governed by the quantization principles that underlie Quantum Mechanics. Quantization keeps energy from being dispersed into space and allows the material universe to exist as a "going concern" as the revelators and as Physicist Sir James Jean put it.